Religion and Politics Nowadays

The West has been around a battle having an opponent that tries totally alter its tradition to alter its type of government and eliminate its life-style since September 11, 2001. The West continues to be paralyzed within this battle practically right from the start for failure to understand how to name the enemy since the enemy’s philosophy has its roots in faith.

The West described its opponent as “Radical Islam.”

Islam considers itself. It tries to “control not just the person’s connection with god (through his conscious), but human interactions in a cultural environment aswell. There’s not just Islamic religious organizations, but additionally, an Islamic law, state, along with other institutions governing society.”* After centuries of politics and faith being individual within the West, it’s practically impossible for the contemporary Western mind that the ideology could be both a faith along with a political philosophy in the same time.

How to proceed when an opponent tries to eliminate you centered on religion whenever your culture holds the free exercise of faith as well as separation of state and church? It has become the paralyzing and fantastic issue of the West.

Emphasis Added To The Wrong Thing

Although this language is correct, it hindered its capability to combat this mortal enemy and set the focus on faith, that has resulted in a good deal of worry in Western culture. Types of this are costs of religious discrimination within the “refugee” disaster in Europe as well as in America over President Trump’s travel ban on folks from eight nations which are hot-beds of terrorism. Personally, this is unfair and I hope he doesn’t ban people who are refugees in the first place. Hell, he should first ban youtube to mp3 mobile websites or other illegal websites. Again, emphasis added to the wrong thing.

The Importance Should Be About The Political Part Of This

The target of what it tries to complete is political as the philosophy of the opponent has its origins in faith. Thus, the West should alter the language where it goes, it uses to place the emphasis, about the political aspect of the, not the spiritual element.

Bin Laden-ists and Khomeini-ists are Revolutionary Islamists who employ violent terrorist methods fraud, along with other techniques within their efforts to alter lifestyle and society is controlled. That’s political. Utilizing the terms “Bin Laden-ism” and “Khomeini-ism blows the target of the from faith to politics where it goes.

This change in language allows the West to combine to beat this political opponent in very similar way it beat other totalitarian ideologies previously without making the impact the government can be involved with how people connect with their lord or that it’s at war with a religion.

Semantics within this battle has paralyzed the West and great harm has been caused by this paralysis. This should stop. An excellent world mustn’t be place in risk because of semantics.
Scroll To Top